Central Sleep Apnea in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Taking P2Y12 Inhibitors.

ABSTRACT: Central sleep apnea (CSA) is common in patients with heart failure. Recent studies link ticagrelor use with CSA. We aimed to evaluate CSA prevalence in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and whether ticagrelor use is associated with CSA. We reviewed consecutive patients with CHD who underwent a polysomnography (PSG) test over a 5-year period from 3 sleep centers. We sampled patients who were on ticagrelor or clopidogrel during a PSG test at a 1:4 ticagrelor:clopidogrel ratio. Patients with an active opioid prescription during PSG test were excluded. Age, left ventricle (LV) dysfunction, and P2Y12 inhibitor use were included in a multivariate logistic regression. A total of 135 patients were included with 26 on ticagrelor and 109 on clopidogrel (age 64.1 ± 11.4, 32% male). High CSA burden (12%) and strict CSA (4.4%) were more common in patients on ticagrelor than in those on clopidogrel (27% vs. 8.3% and 10.0% vs. 1.8%). Ticagrelor use (vs. clopidogrel) was associated with high CSA burden (OR 3.53, 95% CI 1.04-12.9, P = 0.039) and trended toward significance for strict CSA (OR 6.32, 95% CI 1.03-51.4, P = 0.052) when adjusting for age and LV dysfunction. In an additional analysis also adjusting for history of atrial fibrillation, ticagrelor use and strict CSA became significantly associated (OR 10.0, 95% CI 1.32-117, P = 0.035). CSA was uncommon in patients with CHD undergoing sleep studies. Ticagrelor use (vs. clopidogrel) was associated with high CSA burden and trended toward significance for strict CSA.

A mathematical model to serve as a clinical tool for assessing obstructive sleep apnea severity.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep disorder caused by periodic airway obstructions and has been associated with numerous health consequences, which are thought to result from tissue hypoxia. However, challenges in the direct measurement of tissue-level oxygenation make it difficult to analyze the hypoxia exposure pattern in patients. Furthermore, current clinical practice relies on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and pulse oximetry to assess OSA severity, both of which have limitations. To overcome this, we developed a clinically deployable mathematical model, which outputs tissue-level oxygenation. The model incorporates spatial pulmonary oxygen uptake, considers dissolved oxygen, and can use time-dependent patient inputs. It was applied to explore a series of breathing patterns that are clinically differentiated. Supporting previous studies, the result of this analysis indicated that the AHI is an unreliable indicator of hypoxia burden. As a proof of principle, polysomnography data from two patients was analyzed with this model. The model showed greater sensitivity to breathing in comparison with pulse oximetry and provided systemic venous oxygenation, which is absent from clinical measurements. In addition, the dissolved oxygen output was used to calculate hypoxia burden scores for each patient and compared to the clinical assessment, highlighting the importance of event length and cumulative impact of obstructions. Furthermore, an intra-patient statistical analysis was used to underscore the significance of closely occurring obstructive events and to highlight the utility of the model for quantitative data processing. Looking ahead, our model can be used with polysomnography data to predict hypoxic burden on the tissues and help guide patient treatment decisions.

Adaptive servo-ventilation and mortality in patients with systolic heart failure and central sleep apnea: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Central sleep apnea (CSA) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Treatment of CSA with a certain type of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) device that targets minute ventilation (ASVmv) was found to be harmful in these patients. A newer generation of ASV devices that target peak flow (ASVpf) is presumed to have different effects on ventilation and airway patency. We analyzed our registry of patients with HFrEF-CSA to examine the effect of exposure to ASV and role of each type of ASV device on mortality. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study in patients with HFrEF and CSA who were treated with ASV devices between 2008 and 2015 at a single institution. Mortality data were collected through the institutional data honest broker. Usage data were obtained from vendors' and manufacturers' servers. Median follow-up was 64 months. RESULTS: The registry included 90 patients with HFrEF-CSA who were prescribed ASV devices. Applying a 3-h-per-night usage cutoff, we found a survival advantage at 64 months for those who used the ASV device above the cutoff (n = 59; survival 76%) compared to those who did not (n = 31; survival 49%; hazard ratio 0.44; CI 95%, 0.20 to 0.97; P = 0.04). The majority (n = 77) of patients received ASVpf devices with automatically adjusting end-expiratory pressure (EPAP) and the remainder (n = 13) received ASVmv devices mostly with fixed EPAP (n = 12). There was a trend towards a negative correlation between ASVmv with fixed EPAP and survival. CONCLUSION: In this population of patients with HFrEF and CSA, there was no evidence that usage of ASV devices was associated with increased mortality. However, there was evidence of differential effects of type of ASV technology on mortality.

Clinical and financial impact of sleep disordered breathing on heart failure admissions.

BACKGROUND: The impact of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) on heart failure (HF) is increasingly recognized. However, limited data exist in support of quantification of the clinical and financial impact of SDB on HF hospitalizations. METHODS: A sleep-heart registry included all patients who underwent inpatient sleep testing during hospitalization for HF at a single cardiac center. Readmission data and actual costs of readmissions were obtained from the institutional honest broker. Patients were classified based on the inpatient sleep study as having no SDB, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), or central sleep apnea (CSA). Cumulative cardiac readmission rates and costs through 3 and 6 months post-discharge were calculated. Unadjusted and adjusted (age, sex, body mass index, and left ventricular ejection fraction) modeling of cost was performed. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 1547 patients, 393 (25%) had no SDB, 438 (28%) had CSA, and 716 (46%) had OSA. Within 6 months of discharge, 195 CSA patients (45%), 264 OSA patients (37%), and 109 no SDB patients (28%) required cardiovascular readmissions. Similarly, 3- and 6-month mortality rates were higher in both SDB groups than those with no SDB. Both unadjusted and adjusted readmission costs were higher in the OSA and CSA groups compared to no SDB group at 3 and 6 months post-discharge with the CSA and OSA group costs nearly double (~ $16,000) the no SDB group (~ $9000) through 6 months. INTERPRETATION: Previously undiagnosed OSA and CSA are common in patients hospitalized with HF and are associated with increased readmissions rate and mortality.

Central sleep apnea treatment in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) is contraindicated for the treatment of central sleep apnea (CSA) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), limiting treatment options. Though continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bi-level PAP with back-up rate (BPAP-BUR), and transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) are alternatives, not much is known about their comparative efficacies, which formed the basis of conducting this network meta-analysis. We sought to analyze their comparative effectiveness in reducing apnea hypopnea index (AHI). Additionally, we also studied their comparative effectiveness on subjective daytime sleepiness as assessed by Epworth sleepiness score (ESS). METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed were analyzed in a network meta-analysis and relative superiority was computed based on P-score ranking and Hasse diagrams. RESULTS: Network meta-analysis based on 8 RCTs showed that when compared to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT-used as a common comparator across trials), reduction in AHI by ASV (- 26.05 [- 38.80; - 13.31]), TPNS (- 24.90 [- 42.88; - 6.92]), BPAP-BUR (- 20.36 [- 36.47; - 4.25]), and CPAP (- 16.01 [- 25.42; - 6.60]) were statistically significant but not between the interventions. Based on 6 RCTs of all the interventions, only TPNS showed a statistically significant decrease in ESS (- 3.70 (- 5.58; - 1.82)) when compared to GDMT, while also showing significant differences when compared with ASV (- 3.20 (- 5.86; - 0.54)), BPAP-BUR (- 4.00 (- 7.33; - 0.68)), and CPAP (- 4.45 (- 7.75; - 1.14)). Ranking of treatments based on Hasse diagram, accounting for both AHI and ESS as outcomes for relative hierarchy showed relative superiority of both ASV and TPNS over BPAP-BUR and CPAP. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated relative superiority of TPNS and ASV to BPAP-BUR and CPAP in their effects on AHI and ESS.

Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Central Sleep Apnea: Clinical and Billing Review.

Central sleep apnea (CSA) frequently coexists with heart failure and atrial fibrillation and contributes to cardiovascular disease progression and mortality. A transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) system has been approved for the first time by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of CSA. This system, remede System (Zoll Medical, Inc.), is implanted during a minimally invasive outpatient procedure and has shown a favorable safety and efficacy profile. Currently, patient access to this therapy remains limited by the small number of specialized centers in the United States and the absence of a standard coverage process by insurers. Although a period of evaluation by insurers is expected for new therapies in their early stages, the impact on patients is particularly severe given the already limited treatment options for CSA. Implantation and management of this novel therapy require the establishment of a specialized multidisciplinary program as part of a sleep medicine practice and support from health care systems and hospitals. Several centers in the United States have been successful in building sustainable TPNS programs offering this novel therapy to their patients by navigating the current reimbursement environment. In this article, we review the background and efficacy data of TPNS and briefly address relevant aspects of the clinical activities involved in a TPNS program. The article presents the status of coverage and reimbursement for this novel therapy. We also discuss the current approach to obtaining reimbursement from third-party payors during this transitional period of evaluation by Medicare and other insurers.

Pathways of Microcirculatory Endothelial Dysfunction in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Comprehensive Ex Vivo Evaluation in Human Tissue.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism and markers of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remain unknown. The microcirculation is the site of early changes in OSA patients who are free of CVD risk. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed moderate to severe OSA (n = 7) were studied before and 12 weeks after intensive treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), along with weight and age matched controls (n = 7). Microcirculatory vessels were isolated from gluteal biopsies and changes in critical functional genes were measured. RESULTS: The following genes changed after 12 weeks of intensive CPAP therapy in the microcirculatory vessels: angiotensin receptor type 1 (AGTR-1) (11.6 (3.4) to 6 (0.8); P = 0.019); NADPH oxidase (NOX4) (0.85 (0.02) to 0.79 (0.11); P = 0.016); and dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH 1) (1 (0.31) to 0.55 (0.1); P = 0.028). Despite decreased nitric oxide (NO) availability as measured indirectly through brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, endothelial NO synthase (NOS3) did not change with CPAP. Other disease markers of OSA that changed with treatment in the microcirculation were endothelin, hypoxia inducible factor 1a, nuclear factor kappa B, interleukin-8, and interleukin-6. CONCLUSIONS: In this ex vivo evaluation of the microcirculation of patients with OSA and no CVD risk, several pathways of CVD were activated supporting that OSA independently induces microcirculatory endothelial dysfunction and serving as disease-specific markers for future pharmacological targeting of OSA-related CVD risk. The findings support the role of renin-angiotensin activation and endothelial oxidative stress in the decreased microcirculatory NO availability in OSA.

Research Priorities for Patients with Heart Failure and Central Sleep Apnea. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.

Background: Central sleep apnea (CSA) is common among patients with heart failure and has been strongly linked to adverse outcomes. However, progress toward improving outcomes for such patients has been limited. The purpose of this official statement from the American Thoracic Society is to identify key areas to prioritize for future research regarding CSA in heart failure.Methods: An international multidisciplinary group with expertise in sleep medicine, pulmonary medicine, heart failure, clinical research, and health outcomes was convened. The group met at the American Thoracic Society 2019 International Conference to determine research priority areas. A statement summarizing the findings of the group was subsequently authored using input from all members.Results: The workgroup identified 11 specific research priorities in several key areas: 1) control of breathing and pathophysiology leading to CSA, 2) variability across individuals and over time, 3) techniques to examine CSA pathogenesis and outcomes, 4) impact of device and pharmacological treatment, and 5) implementing CSA treatment for all individualsConclusions: Advancing care for patients with CSA in the context of heart failure will require progress in the arenas of translational (basic through clinical), epidemiological, and patient-centered outcome research. Given the increasing prevalence of heart failure and its associated substantial burden to individuals, society, and the healthcare system, targeted research to improve knowledge of CSA pathogenesis and treatment is a priority.

A 17-Year-Old With Becker Muscular Dystrophy and Unusual Polysomnography Findings.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 17-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with Becker muscular dystrophy (nonsense mutation [c.3822C>A] within exon 28 of the DMD gene) at 6 years of age was evaluated in the multidisciplinary neuromuscular clinic for loss of ambulation for 1 year. From a pulmonary perspective, there were no acute or chronic respiratory symptoms, and no history of pneumonia or aspiration. Clinical examination revealed a nonambulant teenager, with normal oxygen saturation and end-tidal CO2 when awake, no respiratory distress, and symmetrically diminished aeration due to obesity (BMI 40 kg/m2). Results of pulmonary function testing revealed FVC of 83% predicted with actual volume of 3.5 L and peak cough flow of 445 L/min (all within normal limits).

In-Hospital Management of Sleep Apnea During Heart Failure Hospitalization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with increased mortality and readmissions in patients with heart failure (HF). The effect of in-hospital diagnosis and treatment of OSA during decompensated HF episodes remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: A single-site, randomized, controlled trial of hospitalized patients with decompensated HF (n = 150) who were diagnosed with OSA during the hospitalization was undertaken. All participants received guideline-directed therapy for HF decompensation. Participants were randomized to an intervention arm which received positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy during the hospitalization (n = 75) and a control arm (n = 75). The primary outcome was discharge left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The LVEF changed in the PAP arm from 25.5 ± 10.4 at baseline to 27.3 ± 11.9 at discharge. In the control group, LVEF was 27.3 ± 11.7 at baseline and 28.8 ± 10.5 at conclusion. There was no significant effect on LVEF of in-hospital PAP compared with controls (P = .84) in the intention-to-treat analysis. The on-treatment analysis in the intervention arm showed a significant increase in LVEF in participants who used PAP for ≥3 hours per night (n = 36, 48%) compared with those who used it less (P = .01). There was a dose effect with higher hours of use associated with more improvement in LVEF. Follow-up of readmissions at 6 months after discharge revealed a >60% decrease in readmissions for patients who used PAP ≥3 h/night compared with those who used it <3 h/night (P < .02) and compared with controls (P < .04). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital treatment with PAP was safe but did not significantly improve discharge LVEF in patients with decompensated HF and newly diagnosed OSA. An exploratory analysis showed that adequate use of PAP was associated with higher discharge LVEF and decreased 6 months readmissions.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes of Therapies for Patients With Central Sleep Apnea and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and predominant central sleep apnea pose treatment challenges. A system review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were undertaken. Electronic searches of digital repositories, journals, specialty society and manufacturer websites, manual searches of reference sections of RCTs, and published clinical guidelines were performed. Studies were graded for bias. Meta-analytic random effects models were used. Outcomes of interest included: sleep, cardiovascular, mortality, and quality of life (QoL). Grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation was performed. Nineteen randomized studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria of apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥10, predominant central sleep apnea (CSA), and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) ≤50%. Most trials examined adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) (8 studies) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (9 studies). Bias existed in that: 15 of 19 (79%) of the trials lacked blinding, 10 of 19 were manufacturer funded, and with attrition in 8 of 19 studies. In meta-analysis, ASV performed better than control on sleep but not on QoL or cardiovascular outcomes, including mortality. CPAP demonstrated positive short-term outcomes on sleep, cardiovascular, and QoL (3 months). Longer-term cardiovascular and mortality data did not show benefit. Drug therapies demonstrated a positive clinical effect short term on sleep outcomes only. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) demonstrated positive treatment outcomes on sleep and QoL at 6 months. Evidence suggests improvement in cardiovascular outcomes with TPNS. In conclusion, ASV and CPAP therapies improve sleep, but long-term QoL or cardiovascular benefit was lacking. TPNS exhibited positive outcomes on sleep and QoL at 6 months with positive trends in CV outcomes.

Update on Apneas of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Emphasis on the Physiology of Treatment: Part 2: Central Sleep Apnea.

Central sleep apnea/Hunter-Cheyne-Stokes breathing (CSA/HCSB) is prevalent in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The acute pathobiologic consequences of CSA/HSCB eventually lead to sustained sympathetic overactivity, repeated hospitalization, and premature mortality. A few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown statistically significant and clinically important reduction in sympathetic activity when CSA/HCSB is attenuated by oxygen or PAP therapy. Yet, the two largest PAP RCTs in patients with HFrEF, one with CPAP and the other with adaptive servoventilation (ASV), were negative with respect to their primary outcomes, and both were associated with excess mortality. However, both trials suffered from significant deficiencies, casting doubt on their results. A second RCT evaluating an ASV device with an advanced algorithm is ongoing. A new modality of therapy, unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation, has undergone an RCT that demonstrated an improvement in CSA that was associated with a reduction in arousals, improvement in sleepiness, and improvement in quality of life. However, a long-term mortality trial has not been performed with this modality. Most recently, the National Institutes of Health has funded a long-term, phase 3 RCT of low-flow oxygen vs sham for the treatment of CSA/HCSB in HFrEF. The composite primary outcome includes all-cause mortality and hospitalization for worsening HF. In this article, we focus on various therapeutic options for the treatment of CSA/HCSB and, when appropriate, emphasize the importance of identifying CSA/HCSB phenotypes to tailor treatment.

Apneas of Heart Failure and Phenotype-Guided Treatments: Part One: OSA.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), including OSA and central sleep apnea, is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF). Multiple studies have reported this high prevalence in asymptomatic as well as symptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), as well as in those with HF with preserved ejection fraction. The acute pathobiologic consequences of OSA, including exaggerated sympathetic activity, oxidative stress, and inflammation, eventually could lead to progressive left ventricular dysfunction, repeated hospitalization, and excessive mortality. Large numbers of observational studies and a few small randomized controlled trials have shown improvement in various cardiovascular consequences of SDB with treatment. There are no long-term randomized controlled trials to show improved survival of patients with HF and treatment of OSA. One trial of positive airway pressure treatment of OSA included patients with HF and showed no improvement in clinical outcomes. However, any conclusions derived from this trial must take into account several important pitfalls that have been extensively discussed in the literature. With the role of positive airway pressure as the sole therapy for SDB in HF increasingly questioned, a critical examination of long-accepted concepts in this field is needed. The objective of this review was to incorporate recent advances in the field into a phenotype-based approach to the management of OSA in HF.

Periorbital desmoplastic squamous cell carcinoma.

Desmoplasia is the formation of a dense collagenous stroma around a neoplasm. It occurs in a variety of malignancies including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). While desmoplasia is uncommonly seen in cutaneous SCC, it is an independent risk factor for recurrence and metastasis. We report a case series of desmoplastic SCC in the periorbital region. Seven cases were identified: the median age was 68, four were men. The mean follow-up was 48 months. Two patients (29%) had aggressive local recurrence: one required salvage surgery including orbital exenteration, parotidectomy, and neck dissection to excise involved parotid and cervical lymph nodes; the other required repeat excision and adjuvant radiotherapy. Desmoplastic SCC is an uncommon but highly aggressive subtype. In the periorbital region, due to the high risk of orbital invasion, it is potentially sight and life-threatening.